The aftermath of online casinos in Florida showed some unexpected prejudice in the reporting of a possible options to Governor Charlie Crist. As Governor Charlie Crist examine the potential effects of online poker rooms and online casino sites.
However, some of the writing has led readers to question what sources the gaming survey employed. The possibility of a law allowing intrastate online poker or online casinos, the committee noted that some gambling opponents;
An argue that prevalence of gambling addiction is three to four times higher with Internet gambling than with non-Internet gambling. Unfortunately, there are no sources are footnoted, leaving the reader the impression that such an argument can be substantiated by objective scientific research.Last September 2009 as reported by the St. Petersburg Times: Governor Charlie Crist and the Seminole Tribe on Monday signed a new gambling agreement to allow the tribe to keep its slot machines and black jack games at the tribe's Florida casinos in exchange for $150 million a year in payments to the state.
Last week, A report requested by the state of Florida at the beginning of this year has been introduced to state officials. This report indicates the possibility of tax revenue up to $90 million that could have been generated each year by legalizing online poker.
For the preparation for debate scheduled on December 1st, the independent company American Poker Ventures brought its report to the Florida Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability last week. The research of APV was conducted with the help of UK gambling consultancy H2, which unveiled that its tax estimations were calculated according to total gross online poker rake of $226 million in the initial year of legalization, $331 million in second year and $457 million in third year, from which the state government could expect a 20 percent cut. The outlook of this kind of income is going to be tempting to a state badly putting its effort into balance its budget in difficult time.
The report indicates a single-center system that would be operated by a private operative under agreement with the state government following a certain process. Half the poker gross rake produced within state borders would be divided amongst the card rooms and groups with gaming compacts approached as licensees, with 30 % going to the systems operator, and the rest of 20 % going to the state.
Post a Comment